introduction to Business ethics
What is Business Ethics?
Proper business policies and practices regarding potentially controversial issues, such as corporate governance, insider trading, bribery, discrimination, corporate social responsibility and fiduciary responsibilities. Business ethics are often guided by law, while other times provide a basic framework that businesses may choose to follow in order to gain public acceptance.
Proper business policies and practices regarding potentially controversial issues, such as corporate governance, insider trading, bribery, discrimination, corporate social responsibility and fiduciary responsibilities. Business ethics are often guided by law, while other times provide a basic framework that businesses may choose to follow in order to gain public acceptance.
Business ethics theory application
Some professional organizations define their ethical approach in terms of a number of discrete components. Typically these include:
Business ethics has both normative and descriptive dimensions. As a corporate practice and a career specialization, the field is primarily normative. Academics attempting to understand business behavior employ descriptive methods. The range and quantity of business ethical issues reflects the interaction of profit-maximizing behavior with non-economic concerns. Interest in business ethics accelerated dramatically during the 1980s and 1990s, both within major corporations and within academia. For example, today most major corporations promote their commitment to non-economic values under headings such as ethics codes and social responsibility charters. Adam Smith said, "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices." Governments use laws and regulations to point business behavior in what they perceive to be beneficial directions. Ethics implicitly regulates areas and details of behavior that lie beyond governmental control. The emergence of large corporations with limited relationships and sensitivity to the communities in which they operate accelerated the development of formal ethics regimes.
Business ethics reflects the philosophy of business, one of whose aims is to determine the fundamental purposes of a company. If a company's purpose is to maximize shareholder returns, then sacrificing profits to other concerns is a violation of its fiduciary responsibility. Corporate entities are legally considered as persons in USA and in most nations. The 'corporate persons' are legally entitled to the rights and liabilities due to citizens as persons.
Economist Milton Friedman writes that corporate executives' "responsibility... generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to their basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom". Friedman also said, "the only entities who can have responsibilities are individuals ... A business cannot have responsibilities. So the question is, do corporate executives, provided they stay within the law, have responsibilities in their business activities other than to make as much money for their stockholders as possible? And my answer to that is, no, they do not." A survey found support for this view among the "informed public" ranging from 30 to 80%. Ronald Duska views Friedman's argument as consequentialist rather than pragmatic, implying that unrestrained corporate freedom would benefit the most in long term. Similarly author business consultant Peter Drucker observed, "There is neither a separate ethics of business nor is one needed", implying that standards of personal ethics cover all business situations. However, Peter Drucker in another instance observed that the ultimate responsibility of company directors is not to harm--primum non nocere. Another view of business is that it must exhibit corporate social responsibility (CSR): an umbrella term indicating that an ethical business must act as a responsible citizen of the communities in which it operates even at the cost of profits or other goals. In the US and most other nations corporate entities are legally treated as persons in some respects. For example, they can hold title to property, sue and be sued and are subject to taxation, although their free speech rights are limited. This can be interpreted to imply that they have independent ethical responsibilities. Duska argues that stakeholders have the right to expect a business to be ethical; if business has no ethical obligations, other institutions could make the same claim which would be counterproductive to the corporation.
Ethical issues include the rights and duties between a company and its employees, suppliers, customers and neighbors, its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders. Issues concerning relations between different companies include hostile take-overs and industrial espionage. Related issues include corporate governance;corporate social entrepreneurship; political contributions; legal issues such as the ethical debate over introducing a crime of corporate manslaughter; and the marketing of corporations' ethics policies. According to research, the three major areas of public concern regarding business ethics are executive pay, corporate tax avoidance and bribery and corruption.
Influences of Business Ethics:
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Transparency
- Accountability
- Confidentiality
- Objectivity
- Respectfulness
- Obedience to the law
- Loyalty
Business ethics has both normative and descriptive dimensions. As a corporate practice and a career specialization, the field is primarily normative. Academics attempting to understand business behavior employ descriptive methods. The range and quantity of business ethical issues reflects the interaction of profit-maximizing behavior with non-economic concerns. Interest in business ethics accelerated dramatically during the 1980s and 1990s, both within major corporations and within academia. For example, today most major corporations promote their commitment to non-economic values under headings such as ethics codes and social responsibility charters. Adam Smith said, "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices." Governments use laws and regulations to point business behavior in what they perceive to be beneficial directions. Ethics implicitly regulates areas and details of behavior that lie beyond governmental control. The emergence of large corporations with limited relationships and sensitivity to the communities in which they operate accelerated the development of formal ethics regimes.
Business ethics reflects the philosophy of business, one of whose aims is to determine the fundamental purposes of a company. If a company's purpose is to maximize shareholder returns, then sacrificing profits to other concerns is a violation of its fiduciary responsibility. Corporate entities are legally considered as persons in USA and in most nations. The 'corporate persons' are legally entitled to the rights and liabilities due to citizens as persons.
Economist Milton Friedman writes that corporate executives' "responsibility... generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to their basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom". Friedman also said, "the only entities who can have responsibilities are individuals ... A business cannot have responsibilities. So the question is, do corporate executives, provided they stay within the law, have responsibilities in their business activities other than to make as much money for their stockholders as possible? And my answer to that is, no, they do not." A survey found support for this view among the "informed public" ranging from 30 to 80%. Ronald Duska views Friedman's argument as consequentialist rather than pragmatic, implying that unrestrained corporate freedom would benefit the most in long term. Similarly author business consultant Peter Drucker observed, "There is neither a separate ethics of business nor is one needed", implying that standards of personal ethics cover all business situations. However, Peter Drucker in another instance observed that the ultimate responsibility of company directors is not to harm--primum non nocere. Another view of business is that it must exhibit corporate social responsibility (CSR): an umbrella term indicating that an ethical business must act as a responsible citizen of the communities in which it operates even at the cost of profits or other goals. In the US and most other nations corporate entities are legally treated as persons in some respects. For example, they can hold title to property, sue and be sued and are subject to taxation, although their free speech rights are limited. This can be interpreted to imply that they have independent ethical responsibilities. Duska argues that stakeholders have the right to expect a business to be ethical; if business has no ethical obligations, other institutions could make the same claim which would be counterproductive to the corporation.
Ethical issues include the rights and duties between a company and its employees, suppliers, customers and neighbors, its fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders. Issues concerning relations between different companies include hostile take-overs and industrial espionage. Related issues include corporate governance;corporate social entrepreneurship; political contributions; legal issues such as the ethical debate over introducing a crime of corporate manslaughter; and the marketing of corporations' ethics policies. According to research, the three major areas of public concern regarding business ethics are executive pay, corporate tax avoidance and bribery and corruption.
Influences of Business Ethics:
Varying levels of Unethical Actions:
Guidelines to Creating an Ethical Organization:
Personal Reflection:
Ensuring that I act appropriately when my ethics are challenged in the business environment will be key to may career success. As it takes someone many years to develop the knowledge and reputations required to be an industry driving leader, engaging in non-ethical behavior can negate all of those efforts. As I desire to have a substantial impact in the healthcare field, an industry driven by ethically providing patient care, any lapse in my high ethical standards could be extremely detrimental. Yet by designing and implementing policies that set high standards of ethical behavior as well as ensure that those who report unethical behavior remain anonymous will assist with ensuring ethical practices in the future.
Ensuring that I act appropriately when my ethics are challenged in the business environment will be key to may career success. As it takes someone many years to develop the knowledge and reputations required to be an industry driving leader, engaging in non-ethical behavior can negate all of those efforts. As I desire to have a substantial impact in the healthcare field, an industry driven by ethically providing patient care, any lapse in my high ethical standards could be extremely detrimental. Yet by designing and implementing policies that set high standards of ethical behavior as well as ensure that those who report unethical behavior remain anonymous will assist with ensuring ethical practices in the future.
analyzing and applying articles on Business ethics
Healthcare Ethics: A patient centered decision model
Article Summary:
The dilemma in healthcare today is how to provide high-quality healthcare while keeping costs at a minimum. Healthcare in the United States is generally provided under two models: fee-for-service and managed care. Under fee-for-service arrangements, doctors set the fee for the services they provide, and patients and/or health insurance companies pay the bill. Until recently, fee-for-service has been the traditional model used in the U.S. In recent years, however, managed care programs have grown significantly. Under managed care programs, third party payers determine how much will be paid for defined medical treatments, and doctors get that amount and no more.
The two types of healthcare models:
Fee for Service
Potential Safe Guards to reduce the threat to patient welfare of the financial incentives and guidelines of managed care:
How can hospitals and physicians reduce the threat to patient welfare by managed care? By following the following principals which incorporate the safe guards:
Business Ethics for Healthcare Organizations
The dilemma in healthcare today is how to provide high-quality healthcare while keeping costs at a minimum. Healthcare in the United States is generally provided under two models: fee-for-service and managed care. Under fee-for-service arrangements, doctors set the fee for the services they provide, and patients and/or health insurance companies pay the bill. Until recently, fee-for-service has been the traditional model used in the U.S. In recent years, however, managed care programs have grown significantly. Under managed care programs, third party payers determine how much will be paid for defined medical treatments, and doctors get that amount and no more.
The two types of healthcare models:
Fee for Service
- No defined population for which the insurance company is responsible.
- Contacts are initiated by patients.
- Main focus is on treating sick patients.
- The responsibility of the insurance company is to pay the bills.
- Physicians decide what care their patients should receive.
- Physicians have an incentive to overuse care;
- Insurance company has no managerial control over healthcare providers, and there is no centralized decision making.
- The locus of the cost/quality trade-off is split:physicians have income incentives to maximize the services they deliver to patients, whereas administrators have market incentives to keep premiums low.
- The managed care organization (MCO) has responsibility for the health of a defined population.
- The MCO is responsible for the entire spectrum of care.
- Contacts are initiated both by patients and by the MCO.
- The MCO “manages” the actions of physicians.
- The MCO has a capacity for centralized decision making.
- The cost/quality trade-off comes together at the level of the medical director, who simultaneously feels pressure both to improve quality and to reduce costs.
Potential Safe Guards to reduce the threat to patient welfare of the financial incentives and guidelines of managed care:
- Disclosure – managed care plans should disclose their policies on physician salaries and guidelines, letting consumers make informed choices.
- Professionalism – the Hippocratic oath’s injunction that “into whatever houses I may enter, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining clear of all involuntary injustice and of other mischief” must remain a central medical value.
- Competition – theoretically, competition could spur healthcare institutions to provide quality care while reducing costs. Ideally, providers who would try to skimp on quality to save money would be forced out of the market.
- Limiting financial incentives – in developing policies to regulate financial incentives for physicians, we must recognize two worthy but competing goals – to protect the quality of patient care and to restrain medical care costs. We need to separate doctors’ incentives and remuneration from their patient care decisions as much as possible.
- Guideline review boards – mandatory, prospective review of all guidelines, algorithms, or critical pathways of healthcare institutions by an independent board is proposed.
- Appeals boards – the establishment of an independent appeals board for each hospital, managed care plan, or group practice is suggested.
How can hospitals and physicians reduce the threat to patient welfare by managed care? By following the following principals which incorporate the safe guards:
Business Ethics for Healthcare Organizations
- Principal-agent model - Since business managers are agents of the shareholders, then their exclusive job of management is to increase shareholder wealth by increasing the present value of the organization.
- Moral reasoning - Morality is viewed as intrinsically good and should be seen as an end in itself, not just as a method for increasing shareholder wealth. In a conflict between moral principles and wealth, morality should always win.
- Non-instrumental ethics - Ethics has a moral veto over maximizing shareholder wealth. Business has no special rules that override the moral obligations managers hold as humans. This approach is grounded in the theories of deontological ethics in which moral rightness is not solely dependent on outcomes or results. Four principles common to the general morality of humans include not harming others, respecting authority, avoiding lying, and honoring agreements.
- Agent-morality perspective - Moral principles are antecedent to the contract between the principal and agent and cannot be suspended by agreement between them. Only after basic moral duties have been met should shareholder wealth be a priority.
- Respect for others – respecting individual autonomy, truth telling, and maintaining confidentiality and fidelity.
- Beneficence – providing benefits to persons while at the same time balancing benefit and harm. Organizations are required to do all they can to aid patients.
- Non-maleficence – “first do no harm.” An example of the balancing act between providing benefit and doing no harm is when staff are put at risk when treating trauma patients.
- Justice – the equitable distribution of benefits and costs among individuals, groups, and organizations. Providing services to medically indigent persons is an example of this ethical standard.
The traditional cost/benefit model used in business decisions is uniquely applied in this patient-centered decision model by putting cost/benefit decisions into the hands of the patient. Currently, healthcare managers or doctors make many healthcare decisions based on cost/benefit information. Since costs and benefits have historically entered into healthcare decisions, and are likely to be an increasingly important part of healthcare decisions in the future, it is important for the patient to be involved in these healthcare decisions. The decision model proposed in this paper is an innovative application of the cost/benefit model to healthcare decisions. The strength of this model is that it places decisions into the hands of those who are best qualified to make the right decision, and the patient is always involved in the decision. Moreover, ethics are an essential part of the decision process. Doctors are best qualified to make medical decisions in consultation with the patient and within the framework of biomedical ethics. Healthcare managers are best qualified to deal with financial issues, such as costs and profits, again in consultation with the patient and within the framework of business ethics. It is the patient, who is at the center of the decision process, who makes the final decision based on appropriate medical and financial information.
Personal Reflection:
By continuing to develop my knowledge of the healthcare industry, , I believe that the potential to employ the patient-centered decision model may become useful in some circumstances. Yet, within the organization that I currently work for, managed care is by far the most prevalent determinate to the way we approach patient care. As many of our patients are on Medicare or Medicaid, a fixed amount of reimbursement is determined by the clinical assessment of each patient. Whether or not the patient want's more or less treatment, our reimbursement remains the same. Furthermore, penalties are assessed to our hospitals if patients are readmitted to our hospital with similar ailments as to those they were previously discharge because of. With the introduction of the affordable care act, even more individuals will now fall under the same reimbursement guidelines. If healthcare providers are continually pushed away from fee-for-service and more towards managed care, i feel that the likelihood of implementing the patient-centered decision model becomes more and more of a distant dream. Nonetheless, addressing this issue will become one of my main career goals; but before I even begin to offer suggestions, I need to gain much more knowledge and insight into the industry.
Personal Reflection:
By continuing to develop my knowledge of the healthcare industry, , I believe that the potential to employ the patient-centered decision model may become useful in some circumstances. Yet, within the organization that I currently work for, managed care is by far the most prevalent determinate to the way we approach patient care. As many of our patients are on Medicare or Medicaid, a fixed amount of reimbursement is determined by the clinical assessment of each patient. Whether or not the patient want's more or less treatment, our reimbursement remains the same. Furthermore, penalties are assessed to our hospitals if patients are readmitted to our hospital with similar ailments as to those they were previously discharge because of. With the introduction of the affordable care act, even more individuals will now fall under the same reimbursement guidelines. If healthcare providers are continually pushed away from fee-for-service and more towards managed care, i feel that the likelihood of implementing the patient-centered decision model becomes more and more of a distant dream. Nonetheless, addressing this issue will become one of my main career goals; but before I even begin to offer suggestions, I need to gain much more knowledge and insight into the industry.
Ethics and Economics in healthcare
Article Summary:
Introduction
As today's healthcare organizations are facing many challenges that put pressure on ethical standards. The ethical challenges the economic changes pose is how to deliver high quality healthcare at the highest possible ethical standards over the next century. In earlier eras of healthcare, ethics had repeatedly trumped economics during the decision making process. Throughout the course of healthcare evolution, the social expectation that hospitals have the responsibility to provide appropriate care at reasonable costs has remained constant. Yet, this standard has become increasingly difficult to meet as "reasonable costs" has come under scrutiny while the quality of care is expected to be maintained if not improved. It has also became more difficult due to the limitations on "reasonable costs" set by non-healthcare providing organizations such as Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurance providers.
Quality of Care and Ethics
With the implementation of Managed Care pay structures, as described in the article summary above, reimbursement standards drive hospitals to generate appropriate, efficient, and reliable care. Appropriate treatment, at the right time, by the right person, in an appropriate setting represents high quality of care. By utilizing research, hospitals can implement practices which deliver highly effective and ethical care. With the development of Managed Care, considerable attention has been brought to ensure the protection of patients in the following ways:
Rethinking Ethics in Hospitals
In the new age of healthcare, hospital need to become agents of accountability by developing social responsibility in their communities. To do so, instead of thinking that ethics is just something that hospitals do, ethics needs to become the reason that hospitals do something. In order to develop this change, hospitals need to utilize their ethical resources more efficiently. By continuing to develop and implement organizational changes based whats best for the patient, the hospital can effectively balance the changes they make to ensure ethical and economic sustainability.
Personal Reflection:
As a Supply Chain professional in healthcare, this article had a strong personal touch as I much more often than not, find myself focusing on cost reduction initiatives rather than improvements to patient care. In a recent experience, the Director of Patient Satisfaction proposed the implementation of a new product which would reduce the number of hospital acquired pressure ulcers. This new product was more expensive when compared to the product which we currently utilized, but due to a reduction in ulcers was expected, the initiative moved forward. After six months post implementation, we have seen nearly 50% reduction in hospital acquired pressure ulcers and only a 5% increase in related expenses due to the new product; making this initiative extremely successful. In order to achieve my goals, one of the key skills I need to succeed is clinical connectivity, by consistently keeping in mind that organizational changes should maintain or improve patient quality, I believe my efforts will be well accepted and effective.
Introduction
As today's healthcare organizations are facing many challenges that put pressure on ethical standards. The ethical challenges the economic changes pose is how to deliver high quality healthcare at the highest possible ethical standards over the next century. In earlier eras of healthcare, ethics had repeatedly trumped economics during the decision making process. Throughout the course of healthcare evolution, the social expectation that hospitals have the responsibility to provide appropriate care at reasonable costs has remained constant. Yet, this standard has become increasingly difficult to meet as "reasonable costs" has come under scrutiny while the quality of care is expected to be maintained if not improved. It has also became more difficult due to the limitations on "reasonable costs" set by non-healthcare providing organizations such as Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurance providers.
Quality of Care and Ethics
With the implementation of Managed Care pay structures, as described in the article summary above, reimbursement standards drive hospitals to generate appropriate, efficient, and reliable care. Appropriate treatment, at the right time, by the right person, in an appropriate setting represents high quality of care. By utilizing research, hospitals can implement practices which deliver highly effective and ethical care. With the development of Managed Care, considerable attention has been brought to ensure the protection of patients in the following ways:
- Informed consent of all medical treatment
- Refuse any unwanted medical treatment
- Confidentiality and privacy of medical information
- Disclosure of relevant medical information
- Protection of vulnerable subjects
Rethinking Ethics in Hospitals
In the new age of healthcare, hospital need to become agents of accountability by developing social responsibility in their communities. To do so, instead of thinking that ethics is just something that hospitals do, ethics needs to become the reason that hospitals do something. In order to develop this change, hospitals need to utilize their ethical resources more efficiently. By continuing to develop and implement organizational changes based whats best for the patient, the hospital can effectively balance the changes they make to ensure ethical and economic sustainability.
Personal Reflection:
As a Supply Chain professional in healthcare, this article had a strong personal touch as I much more often than not, find myself focusing on cost reduction initiatives rather than improvements to patient care. In a recent experience, the Director of Patient Satisfaction proposed the implementation of a new product which would reduce the number of hospital acquired pressure ulcers. This new product was more expensive when compared to the product which we currently utilized, but due to a reduction in ulcers was expected, the initiative moved forward. After six months post implementation, we have seen nearly 50% reduction in hospital acquired pressure ulcers and only a 5% increase in related expenses due to the new product; making this initiative extremely successful. In order to achieve my goals, one of the key skills I need to succeed is clinical connectivity, by consistently keeping in mind that organizational changes should maintain or improve patient quality, I believe my efforts will be well accepted and effective.
exercise and practices to improving business ethics in your organization
Ethical Leadership Exercise:
Introduce situations (e.g., 1-3 below) about which you might contemplate the most ethical responses. One person’s ethical standards may differ from another’s, however, because we all have varying views on what is “right” and “wrong.” Take some time to consider the following situations and how you believe you should – and would – respond. Then, discuss these issues with others to find out if and how your views differ from each other.
(1) Your company/firm wants to sponsor a potentially controversial event (ie. lecture by a polarizing politician or gay marriage/rights speaker) or to engage firm members in pro bono representation of political activists purposefully arrested while protesting at the General Assembly. By simply allowing your company/firm to be associated with this event/representation the company/firm could risk losing credibility. How do you handle this?
(2) You are recognized by your profession or industry at an meeting of influential, prominent leaders or an exclusive organization which you seek membership. They are praising your ingenuity and creativity in a successful program you organized and are offering membership or a prestigious award with a monetary stipend. The only problem is you didn’t create the program – one of your associates did. What do you do? Because the associate created the program for the firm or group you lead, can you take credit? Is it OK to take credit if the associate will probably never find out?
(3) You are concerned with the morale of your group and decide to talk with each person individually to see if you can find out what he problem is. You assure each person all responses will be strictly confidential. Through interview, you discover several people mentioning that Jim, your group treasurer, has been stealing money from the group’s account for his own personal use and threatening anyone who suggests they might report him. How do you handle the situation and maintain your promise of confidentiality? What if you decide to report the problem to authorities and they refuse to take action unless they have the names of the group members who are suspicious?
Exercise Experience:
When my team completed this exercise, we found that although we had different ideas on how to handle each situation, most of our responses revolved around maintaining the main keys to business ethics:
Introduce situations (e.g., 1-3 below) about which you might contemplate the most ethical responses. One person’s ethical standards may differ from another’s, however, because we all have varying views on what is “right” and “wrong.” Take some time to consider the following situations and how you believe you should – and would – respond. Then, discuss these issues with others to find out if and how your views differ from each other.
(1) Your company/firm wants to sponsor a potentially controversial event (ie. lecture by a polarizing politician or gay marriage/rights speaker) or to engage firm members in pro bono representation of political activists purposefully arrested while protesting at the General Assembly. By simply allowing your company/firm to be associated with this event/representation the company/firm could risk losing credibility. How do you handle this?
(2) You are recognized by your profession or industry at an meeting of influential, prominent leaders or an exclusive organization which you seek membership. They are praising your ingenuity and creativity in a successful program you organized and are offering membership or a prestigious award with a monetary stipend. The only problem is you didn’t create the program – one of your associates did. What do you do? Because the associate created the program for the firm or group you lead, can you take credit? Is it OK to take credit if the associate will probably never find out?
(3) You are concerned with the morale of your group and decide to talk with each person individually to see if you can find out what he problem is. You assure each person all responses will be strictly confidential. Through interview, you discover several people mentioning that Jim, your group treasurer, has been stealing money from the group’s account for his own personal use and threatening anyone who suggests they might report him. How do you handle the situation and maintain your promise of confidentiality? What if you decide to report the problem to authorities and they refuse to take action unless they have the names of the group members who are suspicious?
Exercise Experience:
When my team completed this exercise, we found that although we had different ideas on how to handle each situation, most of our responses revolved around maintaining the main keys to business ethics:
- Honesty
- Integrity
- Transparency
- Accountability
- Confidentiality
- Objectivity
- Respectfulness
- Obedience to the law
- Loyalty
references
Journal Article. 2001. 0167-4544. Journal of Business Ethics. V29 1-2 10.1023/A:1006407312383 "Healthcare Ethics: A Patient-Centered Decision Model" http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1006407312383 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001-01-01. Oddo, Alfonso R.125-134. English
Journal Article 2000 0956-2737 HEC Forum 12 1 10.1023/A:1008938532245 "Ethics and Economics in Healthcare: The Role of Organization Ethics" http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1008938532245 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000-03-01 Rorty, Mary V. 57-68. English
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/business-ethics.asp
http://www.bized.co.uk/educators/16-19/business/external/presentation/ethics_map.htm
http://www.gryphonshafer.com/blog/2008/08/i_happen_to_be_a.html
http://soniajaspal.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/impact-of-organization-culture-on-internal-controls/
Ethics Exercise from: Holdon Leadership Center, University of Oregon
Journal Article 2000 0956-2737 HEC Forum 12 1 10.1023/A:1008938532245 "Ethics and Economics in Healthcare: The Role of Organization Ethics" http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1008938532245 Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000-03-01 Rorty, Mary V. 57-68. English
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/business-ethics.asp
http://www.bized.co.uk/educators/16-19/business/external/presentation/ethics_map.htm
http://www.gryphonshafer.com/blog/2008/08/i_happen_to_be_a.html
http://soniajaspal.wordpress.com/2010/10/28/impact-of-organization-culture-on-internal-controls/
Ethics Exercise from: Holdon Leadership Center, University of Oregon